Sondra Light v. Bank of America, as Successor in Interest of La Salle Bank F/K/A Standard Federal Bank and ABN Amro Mortgage Group, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Sondra Light v. Bank of America, as Successor in Interest of La Salle Bank F/K/A Standard Federal Bank and ABN Amro Mortgage Group, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 5, 2010·No. 02-10-00144-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00144-CV

Sondra Light

APPELLANT

V.

Bank of America, as Successor in Interest of La Salle Bank f/k/a Standard Federal Bank and ABN Amro Mortgage Group, Inc.

APPELLEES

------------

FROM THE 43rd District Court OF Parker COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION^{^[1]} AND JUDGMENT

On June 29, 2010, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed this court that arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk=s record as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk=s record and provided this court with proof of payment.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk=s record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J., and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED: August 5, 2010

^{^[1]}See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00144-CV

Sondra Light

APPELLANT

V.

Bank of America, as Successor in Interest of La Salle Bank f/k/a Standard Federal Bank and ABN Amro Mortgage Group, Inc.

APPELLEES

------------

FROM THE 43rd District Court OF Parker COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION^{^[1]} AND JUDGMENT

On June 29, 2010, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed this court that arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk=s record as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk=s record and provided this court with proof of payment.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk=s record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J., and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED: August 5, 2010

^{^[1]}See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Sondra Light v. Bank of America, as Successor in Interest of La Salle Bank F/K/A Standard Federal Bank and ABN Amro Mortgage Group, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Sondra Light v. Bank of America, as Successor in Interest of La Salle Bank F/K/A Standard Federal Bank and ABN Amro Mortgage Group, Inc. (Sondra Light v. Bank of America, as Successor in Interest of La Salle Bank F/K/A Standard Federal Bank and ABN Amro Mortgage Group, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.