Sondheim v. Schmidt

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Sondheim v. Schmidt

32 Misc. 737, 66 N.Y.S. 1034

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 32 Misc. 737 (Sondheim v. Schmidt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sondheim v. Schmidt, 32 Misc. 737, 66 N.Y.S. 1034 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The ruling which sustained the objection to the question: “Did you in July, 1898, have any conversation with Mr. Sondheim as to cancelling the agreement with the defendants? ” was wrong and may have prejudiced the defendant.

The judgment is reversed and a new trial is granted, with costs to abide the event.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The ruling which sustained the objection to the question: “Did you in July, 1898, have any conversation with Mr. Sondheim as to cancelling the agreement with the defendants? ” was wrong and may have prejudiced the defendant.

The judgment is reversed and a new trial is granted, with costs to abide the event.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 Misc. 737, 66 N.Y.S. 1034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sondheim-v-schmidt-nyappterm-1900.