Sonders v. Roosevelt
102 A.D.2d 701, 476 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18856
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 5, 1984·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinions
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Grossman, J.), entered May 23, 1983, which dismissed the complaint, affirmed, without costs. H We affirm the order dismissing the complaint for the reasons stated by Special Term. We also note that the recorded telephone conversation of January 13,1983 is not a note or memorandum in writing subscribed by the defendant in compliance with subdivision a of section 5-701 of the General Obligations Law. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Carro, Milonas and Alexander, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sonders v. Roosevelt, 102 A.D.2d 701, 476 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18856 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).
102 A.D.2d 701 (Sonders v. Roosevelt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
William H. Burke, Cross-Appellant v. Gus Bevona, as President of Local 32b-32j, Service Employees International Union, Afl-Cio, Cross-Appellee
866 F.2d 532 (Second Circuit, 1989)
Roos v. Aloi
127 Misc. 2d 864 (New York Supreme Court, 1985)