Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Sonders v. Roosevelt

Sonders v. Roosevelt

102 A.D.2d 701, 476 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18856
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 5, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 102 A.D.2d 701 (Sonders v. Roosevelt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sonders v. Roosevelt, 102 A.D.2d 701, 476 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18856 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinions

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Grossman, J.), entered May 23, 1983, which dismissed the complaint, affirmed, without costs. H We affirm the order dismissing the complaint for the reasons stated by Special Term. We also note that the recorded telephone conversation of January 13,1983 is not a note or memorandum in writing subscribed by the defendant in compliance with subdivision a of section 5-701 of the General Obligations Law. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Carro, Milonas and Alexander, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

William H. Burke, Cross-Appellant v. Gus Bevona, as President of Local 32b-32j, Service Employees International Union, Afl-Cio, Cross-Appellee
866 F.2d 532 (Second Circuit, 1989)
Roos v. Aloi
127 Misc. 2d 864 (New York Supreme Court, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 A.D.2d 701, 476 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sonders-v-roosevelt-nyappdiv-1984.