Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Sondel v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

Sondel v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

846 So. 2d 659, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8230, 2003 WL 21250860
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 2, 2003
DocketNo. 1D02-0257
StatusPublished

This text of 846 So. 2d 659 (Sondel v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sondel v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 846 So. 2d 659, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8230, 2003 WL 21250860 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Nimali Sondel, the appellant, seeks reversal of an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission which sustained the decision of the appeals referee and thus affirmed the denial of unemployment compensation benefits. Appellant has failed to include a transcript of the hearing before the appeals referee and therefore is unable to show that the findings of the referee are not supported by competent and substantial evidence. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1980). Also, appellant has not identified a misapplication of law. Accordingly, the order under review is AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS AND HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
846 So. 2d 659, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8230, 2003 WL 21250860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sondel-v-florida-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-2003.