Sonberg v. Motor Associates, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sonberg v. Motor Associates, Inc.

254 A.D. 564, 3 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6579

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 4, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 564 (Sonberg v. Motor Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sonberg v. Motor Associates, Inc., 254 A.D. 564, 3 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6579 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to recover for personal injuries. Order denying motion of defendant Marshall to strike out certain paragraphs of the complaint, on the ground that they were insufficient in law to establish, through the medium of a prior adjudication, that he was negligent, and that plaintiff was free from contributory negligence, in connection with a collision in which three automobiles were involved, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (Good Health Dairy Products Cory. v. Emery, 275 N. T. 14; Canfield v. Harris & Co., 252 id. 502; Larme Estates, Inc., v. Omnichrome Cory., 250 App. Div. 538.) Answer may be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to recover for personal injuries. Order denying motion of defendant Marshall to strike out certain paragraphs of the complaint, on the ground that they were insufficient in law to establish, through the medium of a prior adjudication, that he was negligent, and that plaintiff was free from contributory negligence, in connection with a collision in which three automobiles were involved, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (Good Health Dairy Products Cory. v. Emery, 275 N. T. 14; Canfield v. Harris & Co., 252 id. 502; Larme Estates, Inc., v. Omnichrome Cory., 250 App. Div. 538.) Answer may be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 564, 3 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sonberg-v-motor-associates-inc-nyappdiv-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack