Somoza v. Solis

462 So. 2d 1205, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12235
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 5, 1985·No. No. 84-2041·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Elmex Corp. v. Atlantic Federal Savings & Loan Association, 325 So.2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Lustig v. Feinberg, 257 So.2d 299 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972); Horace v. American National Bank & Trust Co., 251 So.2d 33 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971); duPont v. Rubin, 237 So.2d 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970). See Leviten v. Gaunt, 360 So.2d 112 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Fiedelbaum v. Lapidus, 163 So.2d 334 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Somoza v. Solis, 462 So. 2d 1205, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12235 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

462 So. 2d 1205 (Somoza v. Solis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Horace v. American National Bank and Trust Co.
251 So. 2d 33 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Leviten v. Gaunt
360 So. 2d 112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Fiedelbaum v. Lapidus
163 So. 2d 334 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
duPont v. Rubin
237 So. 2d 795 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Lustig v. Feinberg
257 So. 2d 299 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
Elmex Corp. v. Atlantic Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Fort Lauderdale
325 So. 2d 58 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)