Somogye v. New York Central Railroad Company
66 N.E.2d 301, 295 N.Y. 790, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 959
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Dye, JJ. Teacher, J., dissents upon the ground that there was no evidence that the railroad received any consideration for the use of the cars, and, therefore, the transaction must be treated as a gratuitious bailment, and so treated, there was no duty of inspection imposed by law upon the railroad. Medalie, J., deceased.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Somogye v. New York Central Railroad Company, 66 N.E.2d 301, 295 N.Y. 790, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 959 (N.Y. 1946).
66 N.E.2d 301 (Somogye v. New York Central Railroad Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.