Somogye v. New York Central Railroad Company

New York Court of Appeals

Somogye v. New York Central Railroad Company

66 N.E.2d 301, 295 N.Y. 790, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 959

DecidedMarch 7, 1946

StatusPublished

This text of 66 N.E.2d 301 (Somogye v. New York Central Railroad Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Somogye v. New York Central Railroad Company, 66 N.E.2d 301, 295 N.Y. 790, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 959 (N.Y. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Dye, JJ. Teacher, J., dissents upon the ground that there was no evidence that the railroad received any consideration for the use of the cars, and, therefore, the transaction must be treated as a gratuitious bailment, and so treated, there was no duty of inspection imposed by law upon the railroad. Medalie, J., deceased.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Dye, JJ. Teacher, J., dissents upon the ground that there was no evidence that the railroad received any consideration for the use of the cars, and, therefore, the transaction must be treated as a gratuitious bailment, and so treated, there was no duty of inspection imposed by law upon the railroad. Medalie, J., deceased.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 N.E.2d 301, 295 N.Y. 790, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/somogye-v-new-york-central-railroad-company-ny-1946.