Sommers v. Diversified Activities

228 N.W.2d 580, 303 Minn. 573, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1592
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedApril 18, 1975
DocketNo. 45120
StatusPublished

This text of 228 N.W.2d 580 (Sommers v. Diversified Activities) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sommers v. Diversified Activities, 228 N.W.2d 580, 303 Minn. 573, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1592 (Mich. 1975).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Relators seek review of a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission awarding the employee continued benefits for permanent and total disability. They challenge several of the commission’s factual findings. We have carefully reviewed this record and find that the commission’s findings are supported by substantial evidence.1

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strei v. Church of St. Joseph
188 N.W.2d 879 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 N.W.2d 580, 303 Minn. 573, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sommers-v-diversified-activities-minn-1975.