Sommers v. Board of Parole

683 P.2d 1037, 69 Or. App. 8, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3803
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 5, 1984·No. CA A28524·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review, pursuant to ORS 144.335, of a final order of the Oregon State Board of Parole setting her parole release date. We remand for reconsideration.

Petitioner was convicted of murder on September 28, 1982, and was sentenced to life imprisonment, with a minimum sentence of ten years. She contends that the Parole Board abused its discretion in setting her release date at June, 1992, following ten years of incarceration. Without more, we would affirm. However, after the briefs were submitted, State v. Macy, 295 Or 738, 671 P2d 92 (1983), was handed down, holding that the legislature has provided no minimum sentence for murder. It is now clear that the ten-year minimum sentence imposed here is void. Although the sentence may not be modified or vacated in this proceeding, we remand this matter to the Parole Board to reconsider petitioner’s parole release date without taking into account the ten-year minimum sentence invalidly imposed.

Remanded for reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sommers v. Board of Parole, 683 P.2d 1037, 69 Or. App. 8, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3803 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).

683 P.2d 1037 (Sommers v. Board of Parole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Norris v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
952 P.2d 1037 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1998)