Sommermeyer v. Supreme Court of Wyoming

871 F.2d 111, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3858
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided February 1, 1989·No. No. 87-1811·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court upholding the rules of the Wyoming Supreme Court which required that an attorney be a resident of the State of Wyoming in order to be eligible for admission to the bar on motion instead of by taking a bar examination, 659 F.Supp. 207 (1987). Plaintiff Sommermeyer challenges the residency requirement on the grounds that it violates the privileges and immunities clause of article 4, section 2 of the federal constitution. In our view this case is controlled by the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Supreme Court of Virginia v. Friedman, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2260, 101 L.Ed.2d 56 (1988). Based upon that decision we hold that Wyoming Supreme Court Rule 5(c) is unconstitutional, and REVERSE and REMAND to the district court with instructions to enter an order directing that the appropriate official in the State of Wyoming admit plaintiff to the bar of the state.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sommermeyer v. Supreme Court of Wyoming, 871 F.2d 111, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3858 (10th Cir. 1989).

871 F.2d 111 (Sommermeyer v. Supreme Court of Wyoming) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related