Sommer v. Three Towers Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sommer v. Three Towers Associates

154 A.D.2d 588, 546 N.Y.S.2d 545, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13506

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 23, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 154 A.D.2d 588 (Sommer v. Three Towers Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sommer v. Three Towers Associates, 154 A.D.2d 588, 546 N.Y.S.2d 545, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13506 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the plaintiffs and cross appeal by the defendant from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated June 29, 1987, and (2) an order of the same court, entered January 11, 1988.

Ordered that the appeal and cross appeal from the order dated June 29, 1987 are dismissed as abandoned; and it is further,

Ordered that the cross appeal by the defendant from the order entered January 11, 1988 is dismissed as abandoned; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered January 11, 1988 is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the plaintiffs, for reasons stated by Justice Levitt at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

[589]*589Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs. Kooper, J. P., Spatt, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the plaintiffs and cross appeal by the defendant from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated June 29, 1987, and (2) an order of the same court, entered January 11, 1988.

Ordered that the appeal and cross appeal from the order dated June 29, 1987 are dismissed as abandoned; and it is further,

Ordered that the cross appeal by the defendant from the order entered January 11, 1988 is dismissed as abandoned; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered January 11, 1988 is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the plaintiffs, for reasons stated by Justice Levitt at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

[589]*589Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs. Kooper, J. P., Spatt, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

154 A.D.2d 588, 546 N.Y.S.2d 545, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sommer-v-three-towers-associates-nyappdiv-1989.