Sommer v. General Bronze Corp.
238 N.E.2d 317, 21 N.Y.2d 989, 290 N.Y.S.2d 912, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1466
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sommer v. General Bronze Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 N.Y.2d 775 →
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur denied. Since cross appeals are here involved, neither party is entitled to costs. With respect to interest, there is no need for any amendment since, as we read the Appellate Division opinion, the proceeds of the letter of credit, to which defendant-respondent-appellant is entitled, include interest (as sought by said party) upon the escrow deposit of $400,000. [See 21 N Y 2d 775.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sommer v. General Bronze Corp., 238 N.E.2d 317, 21 N.Y.2d 989, 290 N.Y.S.2d 912, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1466 (N.Y. 1968).
238 N.E.2d 317 (Sommer v. General Bronze Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.