Home/New York Court of Appeals/Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.

Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.

580 N.E.2d 766, 78 N.Y.2d 1005, 575 N.Y.S.2d 280, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4183
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 79 N.Y.2d 540 →
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 19, 1991·Published

Opinion

[1006]*1006Appeals taken by Williams Real Estate Co., Inc., Federal Signal Corporation, Kleinberg Electric, Inc., Edwards & Zuck, P. C., National Cleaning Contractors, Inc., Central Elevator, Inc., Hewlett Packard, Inc., Total Energy Control Systems, Inc., Airvel Corp., Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., and Sidney W. Barbanel dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals sua sponte, upon the ground that the order of the Appellate Division upon which jurisdiction is predicated does not grant said appellants leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals.

Judge Titone taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp., 580 N.E.2d 766, 78 N.Y.2d 1005, 575 N.Y.S.2d 280, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4183 (N.Y. 1991).

580 N.E.2d 766 (Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.