Sommer v. E. B. Kelly Co.
182 Misc. 119, 50 N.Y.S.2d 66
Opinion
Inasmuch as the defendant’s misrepresentation was one of fact and not one of law, the amended complaint states a good cause of action. It was error, therefore, for the trial court to dismiss the amended complaint before the opening of counsel to the jury.
The judgment should be reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, with costs to plaintiffs to abide the event.
MaoCrate, Smith and Steinbrink, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sommer v. E. B. Kelly Co., 182 Misc. 119, 50 N.Y.S.2d 66 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).
182 Misc. 119 (Sommer v. E. B. Kelly Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kearse v. Hornell Construction Corp.
183 Misc. 78 (New York Supreme Court, 1944)