Sommella v. Roach

New York Court of Appeals

Sommella v. Roach

449 N.E.2d 1273, 59 N.Y.2d 622, 463 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3032

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 26, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 449 N.E.2d 1273 (Sommella v. Roach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sommella v. Roach, 449 N.E.2d 1273, 59 N.Y.2d 622, 463 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3032 (N.Y. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs. We agree with the Appellate Division that there have not been shown facts sufficient to require a trial of the claim that John Holze disconnected the rope marker in the swimming pool (CPLR 3212, subd [b]).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs. We agree with the Appellate Division that there have not been shown facts sufficient to require a trial of the claim that John Holze disconnected the rope marker in the swimming pool (CPLR 3212, subd [b]).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

449 N.E.2d 1273, 59 N.Y.2d 622, 463 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3032, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sommella-v-roach-ny-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack