Sommella v. Roach
449 N.E.2d 1273, 59 N.Y.2d 622, 463 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3032
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs. We agree with the Appellate Division that there have not been shown facts sufficient to require a trial of the claim that John Holze disconnected the rope marker in the swimming pool (CPLR 3212, subd [b]).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sommella v. Roach, 449 N.E.2d 1273, 59 N.Y.2d 622, 463 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3032 (N.Y. 1983).
449 N.E.2d 1273 (Sommella v. Roach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. Stark
103 A.D.2d 844 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)