Somerville v. Jones

1 Stew. 345
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 15, 1828
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Stew. 345 (Somerville v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Somerville v. Jones, 1 Stew. 345 (Ala. 1828).

Opinion

By JUDGE TAYLOR,

It is believed that the Circuit Court did right in overruling the demurrer. The defendant was informed of the judgement against the plaintiff; for his covenant was to pay that judgement, and by the terms of the instrument which he had executed, he was bound to pay in prtesenti. The plaintiff certainly was not required to wait until his property was levied on and exposed to sale by the sheriff to make the money, and thus subject him" [347]*347self to the very situation which his covenant with the defendant was intended to avoid; nor was he bound to givt-notice to the defendant that the sheriff was urging him for the money. The defendant had all the knowledge necessary to enable him to perform his part of the agreement, and he had ample time afforded him to do so. Let the judgement be affirmed.

Judges Gayle and White not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Young v. Hill
31 N.J. Eq. 429 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1879)
Jones v. Sommerville
1 Port. 437 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1835)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Stew. 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/somerville-v-jones-ala-1828.