Somerstein Caterers of Lawrence, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Somerstein Caterers of Lawrence, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania

262 A.D.2d 252, 692 N.Y.S.2d 369, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7753

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 29, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 262 A.D.2d 252 (Somerstein Caterers of Lawrence, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Somerstein Caterers of Lawrence, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania, 262 A.D.2d 252, 692 N.Y.S.2d 369, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7753 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered November 5, 1998, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by appellants’ brief, granted the cross motion of respondent Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (ISOP) to dismiss the complaint in the first consolidated action, and for summary judgment in the second consolidated action on ISOP’s third cause of action, directing appellant insureds to return $200,000 in insurance proceeds advanced to them by ISOP, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Appellant was the insured under a fire policy issued by ISOP. Appellant’s refusal to present its treasurer or bookkeeper for examination under oath respecting the loss claimed under the subject policy constituted a material breach of the policy’s cooperation clause and, as such, precluded appellants’ recovery of policy proceeds (see, Argento v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 184 AD2d 487; Rosenthal v Prudential Prop. & Cas. Co., 928 F2d 493). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered November 5, 1998, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by appellants’ brief, granted the cross motion of respondent Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (ISOP) to dismiss the complaint in the first consolidated action, and for summary judgment in the second consolidated action on ISOP’s third cause of action, directing appellant insureds to return $200,000 in insurance proceeds advanced to them by ISOP, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Appellant was the insured under a fire policy issued by ISOP. Appellant’s refusal to present its treasurer or bookkeeper for examination under oath respecting the loss claimed under the subject policy constituted a material breach of the policy’s cooperation clause and, as such, precluded appellants’ recovery of policy proceeds (see, Argento v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 184 AD2d 487; Rosenthal v Prudential Prop. & Cas. Co., 928 F2d 493). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D.2d 252, 692 N.Y.S.2d 369, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/somerstein-caterers-of-lawrence-inc-v-insurance-co-of-pennsylvania-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack