Somers v. Barkhempstead
1 Root 262
This text of 1 Root 262 (Somers v. Barkhempstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Somers v. Barkhempstead, 1 Root 262 (Colo. 1791).
Opinion
He could not. Judgment in the County Court was for the defendants. This judgment was affirmed by this court — upon the ground that the plaintiffs had misconceived their action; for if they were injured by the illegal removal of said "Tudman, etc. to their town, trespass and not assumpsit would have been the proper action, unless the paupers had been inhabitants of Barkhempstead.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Root 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/somers-v-barkhempstead-conn-1791.