Somers v. Barkhamstead
1 Root 398
This text of 1 Root 398 (Somers v. Barkhamstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Somers v. Barkhamstead, 1 Root 398 (Colo. 1792).
Opinion
The court found the defendants guilty. Tudman being a foreigner, hath a settlement in no town which is obliged to maintain him, and belongs to the state to provide for; Bark-hamstead’s sending him to Somers was a trespass, for which this action lies. Cause continued and judgment was finally rendered for £30 damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
City of Bridgeport v. Town of Greenwich
165 A. 797 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1933)
Town of Bridgeport v. Town of Trumbull
37 Conn. 484 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1871)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Root 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/somers-v-barkhamstead-conn-1792.