Somer & Wand, P. C. v. Rotondi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Somer & Wand, P. C. v. Rotondi

227 A.D.2d 466, 643 N.Y.S.2d 363

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 13, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 227 A.D.2d 466 (Somer & Wand, P. C. v. Rotondi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Somer & Wand, P. C. v. Rotondi, 227 A.D.2d 466, 643 N.Y.S.2d 363 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action pursuant to Debtor and Creditor Law article 10 (Action No. 2), to set aside the conveyance of certain real property, the defendants Stanley J. and Batía L. Somer appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), dated December 14, 1994, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellants for the reasons stated in Somer & Wand, P. C. v Rotondi (219 AD2d 340). Miller, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action pursuant to Debtor and Creditor Law article 10 (Action No. 2), to set aside the conveyance of certain real property, the defendants Stanley J. and Batía L. Somer appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), dated December 14, 1994, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellants for the reasons stated in Somer & Wand, P. C. v Rotondi (219 AD2d 340). Miller, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 A.D.2d 466, 643 N.Y.S.2d 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/somer-wand-p-c-v-rotondi-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack