Somer Rachelle Nesloney v. the State of Texas
This text of Somer Rachelle Nesloney v. the State of Texas (Somer Rachelle Nesloney v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-22-00006-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
SOMER RACHELLE NESLONEY, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 36th District Court of Aransas County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Benavides, Tijerina, and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Justice Peña
This cause is before the court upon its own motion. On January 5, 2022, appellant
filed a notice of appeal challenging a deferred adjudication community supervision order.
On February 15, 2022, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant’s counsel that it appears
there is no final, appealable order in this matter and requested a correction of the defect, but appellant’s counsel failed to respond. On April 27, 2022, the Court abated the matter
and remanded to the trial court to make appropriate findings and recommendations
concerning the following: (1) whether appellant desired to prosecute this appeal; (2) why
appellant’s counsel failed to file a response regarding the defect in the notice of appeal
and whether counsel had effectively abandoned the appeal; (3) whether appellant had
been denied effective assistance of counsel; (4) whether appellant’s counsel should be
removed; and (5) whether appellant was indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel.
On July 15, 2022, the Court issued a supplemental order of abatement which
additionally required the trial court to make findings and recommendations concerning:
(1) whether the trial court’s certification of appealability is correct; and (2) whether the
appellant has the right of appeal. Upon review of the subsequent supplemental reporter’s
and clerk’s records, an amended certification was executed and filed. The amended
certification reflects that appellant does not have the right to appeal this case.
The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed
if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal.
TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, the appeal is
reinstated and is hereby dismissed. We dismiss all pending motions as moot.
L. ARON PEÑA Justice
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed on the 10th day of March, 2023.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Somer Rachelle Nesloney v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/somer-rachelle-nesloney-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.