Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Soltysiak v. Soltysiak

Soltysiak v. Soltysiak

108 A.D.2d 995, 486 N.Y.S.2d 707, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43323
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 14, 1985·Published

Opinion

Kane, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Prior, Jr., J.), entered April 19, 1984 in Albany County, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion for temporary maintenance and child support.

A review of the record reveals no abuse of discretion by Special Term (see, Bennett v Bennett, 105 AD2d 1047; Hyman v Hyman, 56 AD2d 337). As we have previously indicated in similar situations involving pendente lite orders, “a prompt trial is the most efficacious means to resolve any claimed inequities” (Vallet v Vallet, 86 AD2d 741; accord, Corsell v Corsell, 80 AD2d 544). The order should be affirmed.

Order affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Mikoll and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Soltysiak v. Soltysiak, 108 A.D.2d 995, 486 N.Y.S.2d 707, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43323 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

108 A.D.2d 995 (Soltysiak v. Soltysiak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hyman v. Hyman
56 A.D.2d 337 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Corsell v. Corsell
80 A.D.2d 544 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Vallet v. Vallet
86 A.D.2d 741 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Bennett v. Bennett
105 A.D.2d 1047 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)