Solow Management Corp. v. Seltzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Solow Management Corp. v. Seltzer

18 A.D.3d 399, 795 N.Y.S.2d 448, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5804

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 31, 2005·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered December 6, 2004, which, upon the prior grant of defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211, dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to plaintiff’s arguments, the complaint sets forth

[400] but one arguable misrepresentation by defendant and accordingly does not allege a cognizable claim under Judiciary Law § 487, which provides recourse only where there is a chronic and extreme pattern of legal delinquency (see Jaroslawicz v Cohen, 12 AD3d 160 [2004]; Havell v Islam, 292 AD2d 210 [2002]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Marlow, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered December 6, 2004, which, upon the prior grant of defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211, dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to plaintiff’s arguments, the complaint sets forth

[400] but one arguable misrepresentation by defendant and accordingly does not allege a cognizable claim under Judiciary Law § 487, which provides recourse only where there is a chronic and extreme pattern of legal delinquency (see Jaroslawicz v Cohen, 12 AD3d 160 [2004]; Havell v Islam, 292 AD2d 210 [2002]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Marlow, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Solow Management Corp. v. Seltzer, 18 A.D.3d 399, 795 N.Y.S.2d 448, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5804 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

18 A.D.3d 399 (Solow Management Corp. v. Seltzer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related