Solovicos v. MacLachlan

236 Mass. 402
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 25, 1920·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

This case comes before us on an appeal from the Land Court. Only questions of law raised on the record can be considered. The petitioner claims the real estate in question through an execution sale, respecting which the Land Court judge was unable to discover any invalidity and he found the title to be in the petitioner. Manifestly a pre-existing attachment made upon a writ never entered in court, although undischarged on the record of the registry of deeds, was no bar to the subsequent attachment and sale through which the title of the petitioner is derived. The present apparent misfortune of the appellant is due to failure to take advantage seasonably of the right of redemption afforded her by the statutes. No substantial question of law is disclosed upon this record.

Order for decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Solovicos v. MacLachlan, 236 Mass. 402 (Mass. 1920).

236 Mass. 402 (Solovicos v. MacLachlan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lund v. Cox
183 N.E. 714 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)
Trojanowski v. MacLachlan
133 N.E. 350 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1921)