Solovicos v. MacLachlan

236 Mass. 402
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 25, 1920
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 236 Mass. 402 (Solovicos v. MacLachlan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Solovicos v. MacLachlan, 236 Mass. 402 (Mass. 1920).

Opinion

By the Court.

This case comes before us on an appeal from the Land Court. Only questions of law raised on the record can be considered. The petitioner claims the real estate in question through an execution sale, respecting which the Land Court judge was unable to discover any invalidity and he found the title to be in the petitioner. Manifestly a pre-existing attachment made upon a writ never entered in court, although undischarged on the record of the registry of deeds, was no bar to the subsequent attachment and sale through which the title of the petitioner is derived. The present apparent misfortune of the appellant is due to failure to take advantage seasonably of the right of redemption afforded her by the statutes. No substantial question of law is disclosed upon this record.

Order for decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lund v. Cox
183 N.E. 714 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)
Trojanowski v. MacLachlan
133 N.E. 350 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 Mass. 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solovicos-v-maclachlan-mass-1920.