Solovic v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Solovic v. State

544 S.W.3d 700

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 17, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105480

StatusPublished

This text of 544 S.W.3d 700 (Solovic v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Solovic v. State, 544 S.W.3d 700 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Scott Solovic appeals from the motion court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Motion requesting post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule *70129.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2017).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Scott Solovic appeals from the motion court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Motion requesting post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule *70129.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2017).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

544 S.W.3d 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solovic-v-state-moctapp-2018.