Solone v. City of New York

238 A.D.2d 332, 656 N.Y.S.2d 915, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3430
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 7, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 238 A.D.2d 332 (Solone v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Solone v. City of New York, 238 A.D.2d 332, 656 N.Y.S.2d 915, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3430 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), entered January 2, 1996, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that Administrative Code of City of New York § 7-201 (c) (2) requires a plaintiff to plead and prove that the City had prior notice of a defect in any "street, highway * * * [or] sidewalk” unless it can be demonstrated that the City was affirmatively negligent in causing or creating the defective condition (see, Miller v City of New York, 225 AD2d 396; Elstein v City of New York, 209 AD2d 186). The drainage hole into which the plaintiff fell was located on the side of the highway where he pulled his car off the road, and was in an area included in the definition of a "highway” under Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 118, 143-a, and § 144-a. It is undisputed that the City did not receive notice of the defective condition which caused the injury. Furthermore, notwithstanding the plaintiff’s conclusory assertion that the City "obviously” left the cover off of the hole after removing it to clean the drain, there is no evidence that the City was affirmatively negligent in causing or creating the condition (see, Zinno v City of New York, 160 AD2d 795).

Accordingly, the City’s motion for summary judgment was properly granted. Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estrada v. City of New York
273 A.D.2d 194 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Drennen v. City of New York
256 A.D.2d 379 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Longo v. American Golf Corp.
256 A.D.2d 387 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
238 A.D.2d 332, 656 N.Y.S.2d 915, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solone-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1997.