Solonch v. Lavine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Solonch v. Lavine

51 A.D.2d 804, 380 N.Y.S.2d 71, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11381

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 23, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 804 (Solonch v. Lavine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Solonch v. Lavine, 51 A.D.2d 804, 380 N.Y.S.2d 71, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11381 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, dated May 21, 1974, which, after a statutory fair hearing, affirmed a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York City Department of Social Services, which denied petitioner’s application for public assistance on the ground of his failure to satisfactorily account for the disposition of the proceeds of a certain savings account. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs. In our opinion, the determination was supported by substantial evidence. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Christ and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, dated May 21, 1974, which, after a statutory fair hearing, affirmed a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York City Department of Social Services, which denied petitioner’s application for public assistance on the ground of his failure to satisfactorily account for the disposition of the proceeds of a certain savings account. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs. In our opinion, the determination was supported by substantial evidence. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Christ and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 804, 380 N.Y.S.2d 71, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solonch-v-lavine-nyappdiv-1976.