Solon v. Haykel Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Solon v. Haykel Industries, Inc.

32 A.D.2d 611, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4295

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 3, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.2d 611 (Solon v. Haykel Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Solon v. Haykel Industries, Inc., 32 A.D.2d 611, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4295 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion denied, with costs. Memorandum: It is recognized that upon a proper showing an appellate court may permit an appellant to withdraw an appeal (10 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, § 70:246). No such proof has been presented by movants. It is reasonably clear that all parties to the stipulation contemplated that the respective appeals should be effectively terminated by dismissal thereof. Defendants have submitted no facts that move us to amend our former order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion denied, with costs. Memorandum: It is recognized that upon a proper showing an appellate court may permit an appellant to withdraw an appeal (10 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, § 70:246). No such proof has been presented by movants. It is reasonably clear that all parties to the stipulation contemplated that the respective appeals should be effectively terminated by dismissal thereof. Defendants have submitted no facts that move us to amend our former order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 611, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solon-v-haykel-industries-inc-nyappdiv-1969.