Solon Gershman, Inc. v. Pnk (Es), LLC

Missouri Court of Appeals

Solon Gershman, Inc. v. Pnk (Es), LLC

271 S.W.3d 41, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1491, 2008 WL 5454162

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 12, 2008

DocketED 90707

StatusPublished

This text of 271 S.W.3d 41 (Solon Gershman, Inc. v. Pnk (Es), LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Solon Gershman, Inc. v. Pnk (Es), LLC, 271 S.W.3d 41, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1491, 2008 WL 5454162 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Solon Gershman, Inc. (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s November 1, 2007 Order and Judgment granting summary judgment in favor of PNK (ES), LLC (Pinnacle) and FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership (Felcor) (collectively Respondents) on Counts IV (quantum meruit) and V (unjust enrichment) of Appellant’s petition; and the trial court’s March 18, 2008 Order and Judgment awarding attorney’s fees and costs to Respondents for defending Appellant’s broker’s lien claim. Pinnacle moves for attorney’s fees on appeal.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that Pinnacle and Felcor are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Appellant’s claims. ITT Comm. Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371 (Mo.banc 1993). We also find that the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees and costs to Respondents was not an abuse of discretion, McClain v. Papka, 108 S.W.3d 48 (Mo.App. E.D.2003). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Solon Gershman, Inc. (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s November 1, 2007 Order and Judgment granting summary judgment in favor of PNK (ES), LLC (Pinnacle) and FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership (Felcor) (collectively Respondents) on Counts IV (quantum meruit) and V (unjust enrichment) of Appellant’s petition; and the trial court’s March 18, 2008 Order and Judgment awarding attorney’s fees and costs to Respondents for defending Appellant’s broker’s lien claim. Pinnacle moves for attorney’s fees on appeal.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that Pinnacle and Felcor are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Appellant’s claims. ITT Comm. Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371 (Mo.banc 1993). We also find that the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees and costs to Respondents was not an abuse of discretion, McClain v. Papka, 108 S.W.3d 48 (Mo.App. E.D.2003). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 S.W.3d 41, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1491, 2008 WL 5454162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solon-gershman-inc-v-pnk-es-llc-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack