Solomon v. Woodruff

133 S.E. 314, 35 Ga. App. 368, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 358
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 12, 1926
Docket17184
StatusPublished

This text of 133 S.E. 314 (Solomon v. Woodruff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Solomon v. Woodruff, 133 S.E. 314, 35 Ga. App. 368, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 358 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Bboyles, C. J.

Under the facts of the case the direction of a verdict in favor of the defendant was not error for any reason assigned.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce <md Bloodworth, JJ., ooneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 S.E. 314, 35 Ga. App. 368, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-woodruff-gactapp-1926.