Solomon v. Wakem
6 Ohio Law. Abs. 419
This text of 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 419 (Solomon v. Wakem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Solomon v. Wakem, 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 419 (Ohio Ct. App. 1927).
Opinion
In indorsee’s suit on trade acceptances, where payee, after receiving them in Ohio, sold them to indorsee in Chicago, evidence held not to sustain claim of bad faith on part of plaintiff as indorsee in taking acceptances; hence verdict was properly directed for plaintiff.
For reference to full opinion, see Omnibus Index, last page, this issue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 Ohio Law. Abs. 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-wakem-ohioctapp-1927.