Solomon v. Tupelo Compress Co.
70 Miss. 822
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
If it be held that Solomon appeared and pleaded, no other [825]*825question need be considered. That the plea put in must be held an appearance for Solomon we have no doubt. If judgment by default had been given against Solomon, and he had appealed from that, it would certainly be held that the judgment was wrong.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Solomon v. Tupelo Compress Co., 70 Miss. 822 (Mich. 1893).
70 Miss. 822 (Solomon v. Tupelo Compress Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Little v. Browning
287 Mo. 278 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1921)