Solomon v. Tupelo Compress Co.
70 Miss. 822
This text of 70 Miss. 822 (Solomon v. Tupelo Compress Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Solomon v. Tupelo Compress Co., 70 Miss. 822 (Mich. 1893).
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
If it be held that Solomon appeared and pleaded, no other [825]*825question need be considered. That the plea put in must be held an appearance for Solomon we have no doubt. If judgment by default had been given against Solomon, and he had appealed from that, it would certainly be held that the judgment was wrong.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Little v. Browning
287 Mo. 278 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1921)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
70 Miss. 822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-tupelo-compress-co-miss-1893.