Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Solomon v. Tigre

Solomon v. Tigre

283 A.D.2d 481, 724 N.Y.S.2d 650, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4964
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 14, 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D.2d 481 (Solomon v. Tigre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Solomon v. Tigre, 283 A.D.2d 481, 724 N.Y.S.2d 650, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4964 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered April 18, 2000, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to effectuate expedient service upon him pursuant to CPLR 308 (5).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to effectuate expedient service upon the defendant pursuant to CPLR 308 (5) (see, Solomon v Horie Karate Dojo, 283 AD2d 479 [decided herewith]). Ritter, J. P., McGinity, H. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Solomon v. Horie Karate Dojo
283 A.D.2d 479 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 A.D.2d 481, 724 N.Y.S.2d 650, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-tigre-nyappdiv-2001.