Solomon v. Tigre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Solomon v. Tigre

283 A.D.2d 481, 724 N.Y.S.2d 650, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4964

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 14, 2001·Published

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered April 18, 2000, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to effectuate expedient service upon him pursuant to CPLR 308 (5).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to effectuate expedient service upon the defendant pursuant to CPLR 308 (5) (see, Solomon v Horie Karate Dojo, 283 AD2d 479 [decided herewith]). Ritter, J. P., McGinity, H. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered April 18, 2000, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to effectuate expedient service upon him pursuant to CPLR 308 (5).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to effectuate expedient service upon the defendant pursuant to CPLR 308 (5) (see, Solomon v Horie Karate Dojo, 283 AD2d 479 [decided herewith]). Ritter, J. P., McGinity, H. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.

Solomon v. Tigre, 283 A.D.2d 481, 724 N.Y.S.2d 650, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4964 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

283 A.D.2d 481 (Solomon v. Tigre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related