Solomon v. Terlizzi

15 A.D.2d 802, 224 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11611
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 13, 1962
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 15 A.D.2d 802 (Solomon v. Terlizzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Solomon v. Terlizzi, 15 A.D.2d 802, 224 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11611 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

While plaintiff was entitled to the relief granted, nevertheless under the circumstances disclosed by the record before us defendant is also entitled to be reimbursed, to the extent of $100, for the extra expense and work to which he and his attorney have been put by reason of plaintiff’s default in appearing for trial on the adjourned day. Payment of this sum should be made before the judgment is vacated and the action restored for trial. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leab v. Streit
584 F. Supp. 748 (S.D. New York, 1984)
Kimple v. Auble
87 Misc. 2d 997 (New York County Courts, 1976)
Robert C. Thorpe v. Bessie P. Thorpe
364 F.2d 692 (D.C. Circuit, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 A.D.2d 802, 224 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-terlizzi-nyappdiv-1962.