Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Solomon v. State

Solomon v. State

114 S.E. 813, 29 Ga. App. 201, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 157
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 14, 1922·No. 13815·Published

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

The evidence was not sufficient to authorize the defendant’s conviction, and the court therefore erred in overruling the general grounds of the motion for a new trial. It is unnecessary to consider the special grounds of the motion.

Judgment reversed.

Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Thomas & Walker, Benton Odom, for plaintiff in error,

cited: 16 Ga. App. 216; 22 Ga. App. 274; 26 Ga. App. 421; Id. 426 (3).

James R. Thomas, solicitor, W. B. Gills, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Solomon v. State, 114 S.E. 813, 29 Ga. App. 201, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 157 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

114 S.E. 813 (Solomon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alford v. State
106 S.E. 733 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)