Solomon v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Solomon v. State

114 S.E. 813, 29 Ga. App. 201, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 157

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 14, 1922

Docket13815

StatusPublished

This text of 114 S.E. 813 (Solomon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Solomon v. State, 114 S.E. 813, 29 Ga. App. 201, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 157 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

The evidence was not sufficient to authorize the defendant’s conviction, and the court therefore erred in overruling the general grounds of the motion for a new trial. It is unnecessary to consider the special grounds of the motion.

Judgment reversed.

Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Thomas & Walker, Benton Odom, for plaintiff in error,

cited: 16 Ga. App. 216; 22 Ga. App. 274; 26 Ga. App. 421; Id. 426 (3).

James R. Thomas, solicitor, W. B. Gills, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI