Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Solomon v. State

Solomon v. State

90 S.E. 488, 18 Ga. App. 744, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1235
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 31, 1916
Docket7705
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 90 S.E. 488 (Solomon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Solomon v. State, 90 S.E. 488, 18 Ga. App. 744, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1235 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. The evidence authorized the jury to find that the principal witness for the prosecution was not an accomplice of the defendant. Therefore, in order legally to convict the accused, corroboration of the testimony of this witness was not necessary.

2. Under the facts of the case there is no merit in any of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.

3. The evidence'authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sosebee v. State
274 S.E.2d 717 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Gay v. State
240 S.E.2d 226 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Nobles v. State
228 S.E.2d 391 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Knighton v. State
150 S.E. 432 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 S.E. 488, 18 Ga. App. 744, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-state-gactapp-1916.