Solomon v. State
90 S.E. 488, 18 Ga. App. 744, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1235
Opinion
1. The evidence authorized the jury to find that the principal witness for the prosecution was not an accomplice of the defendant. Therefore, in order legally to convict the accused, corroboration of the testimony of this witness was not necessary.
2. Under the facts of the case there is no merit in any of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.
3. The evidence'authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Solomon v. State, 90 S.E. 488, 18 Ga. App. 744, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1235 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).
90 S.E. 488 (Solomon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sosebee v. State
274 S.E.2d 717 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Gay v. State
240 S.E.2d 226 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Nobles v. State
228 S.E.2d 391 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Knighton v. State
150 S.E. 432 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)