Solomon v. State

25 S.E. 847, 100 Ga. 81, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 554
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 26, 1896·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

1. While it is the right of counsel for the accused' in a criminal case to read law to the jury and comment thereon,, this court will not control the discretion of the trial judge in refusing to allow counsel to read from a Supreme Court report, of this State the facts of a decided case for the purpose of commenting upon and comparing the testimony in that ease-with the facts of the case on trial.

2. This case turned upon the question whether the accused unlawfully or in -self-defense stabbed the person alleged to have been assailed, and the evidence fully warranted the verdict of guilty. Even if the charges complained of were- not in all re-speots accurate, they contain nothing which would justify this court in setting aside the judgment of the court below refusing a new-trial. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Solomon v. State, 25 S.E. 847, 100 Ga. 81, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 554 (Ga. 1896).

25 S.E. 847 (Solomon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moss v. State
86 S.E.2d 708 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Barfield v. State
79 S.E.2d 68 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Johnson v. State
169 S.E. 321 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Glover v. State
82 S.E. 602 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Clark v. State
70 S.E. 90 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Hanley v. State
57 S.E. 236 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Jackson v. State
45 S.E. 604 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Cribb v. State
45 S.E. 396 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)