Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Solomon v. State

Solomon v. State

693 So. 2d 719, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5593, 1997 WL 269321
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 21, 1997
DocketNo. 97-224
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 693 So. 2d 719 (Solomon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Solomon v. State, 693 So. 2d 719, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5593, 1997 WL 269321 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based on our review of the appellant’s motion to clarify sentence [Fla.R.Crim.P.3.800], the State’s response to our order to show cause, and the record on appeal, the trial court’s order denying the motion to correct sentence is reversed, and the case is remanded with directions that the trial court enter a corrected sentencing order in case 92-19938, indicating that the sentence is to run concurrently with the sentences on appellant’s other cases [93-17331, 93-29254, 93-35428, 93-35599, 93-37818], so as to comply with its oral ruling that the sentences in all of appellant’s eases are to run concurrently with each other.

We find no merit to the remaining issue.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gainer v. State
693 So. 2d 719 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
693 So. 2d 719, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5593, 1997 WL 269321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.