Solomon v. State
This text of 185 So. 2d 784 (Solomon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On this appeal by the defendant below, Ernest Solomon, from a judgment of con[785]*785viction for breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony and for grand larceny, reversal is sought on the ground that his confession, received at trial, should have been excluded because it was the fruit of an unlawful arrest. The trial judge concluded the arrest in this case, made without a warrant under § 901.15(2), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., was lawful in the circumstances presented. On consideration of the record and briefs we find no sufficient ground or reason to disturb that holding.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 So. 2d 784, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-state-fladistctapp-1966.