Solomon v. State
39 Ariz. 61
Opinion
Appellant was tried and convicted of an assault with intent to commit the infamous crime against nature. We have examined the record, including the information and the transcript of the testimony, and discover no error. Appellant has neither filed a brief nor assigned any error.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Solomon v. State, 39 Ariz. 61 (Ark. 1931).
39 Ariz. 61 (Solomon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.