Solomon v. Solomon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Solomon v. Solomon

46 A.D.2d 684, 360 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3930

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 21, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 46 A.D.2d 684 (Solomon v. Solomon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Solomon v. Solomon, 46 A.D.2d 684, 360 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3930 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 21, 1974, granting plaintiff a divorce, as directed defendant to pay to plaintiff $7,500 as and for her counsel fees and disbursements, payable in monthly installments of $500 each. Judgment modified, on the facts, by reducing the award for plaintiff’s counsel fees and disbursements to $5,000 and the installments to $333.33 each. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. In our opinion, the award for counsel fees and disbursements was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Shapiro, Christ and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 21, 1974, granting plaintiff a divorce, as directed defendant to pay to plaintiff $7,500 as and for her counsel fees and disbursements, payable in monthly installments of $500 each. Judgment modified, on the facts, by reducing the award for plaintiff’s counsel fees and disbursements to $5,000 and the installments to $333.33 each. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. In our opinion, the award for counsel fees and disbursements was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Shapiro, Christ and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 A.D.2d 684, 360 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-solomon-nyappdiv-1974.