Solomon v. Solomon
This text of 78 S.E. 1079 (Solomon v. Solomon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. A judgment of divorce, based on constructive service, is not within the provisions of the constitution of the United States and statutes passed thereunder, requiring that full faith and credit shall be given in each State to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other State. Such judgment, based entirely on constructive notice, without actual notice or provision for the same to the non-resident defendant, may be collaterally attacked for fraud. Matthews v. Matthews, 139 Ga. 132 (76 S. E. 855).
2. The judge did not abuse his discretion in awarding alimony and counsel fees to the wife, nor was the allowance excessive in amount. Nor did the judge abuse his discretion in awarding the custody of the child to the mother pending the divorce proceeding.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
78 S.E. 1079, 140 Ga. 379, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-solomon-ga-1913.