Solomon v. Smith

248 A.D. 703

This text of 248 A.D. 703 (Solomon v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Solomon v. Smith, 248 A.D. 703 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Action to recover damages against defendant, a Justice of the Supreme Court, alleged to have been sustained by I. Shainin & Company, Incorporated, by the enforcement of the judgment directed to be entered by defendant, on the ground that the same was not authorized. Order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and the judgment entered thereon, and order denying plaintiff’s [704]*704motion to strike out certain denials in defendant’s answer as sham, and to strike out the separate and distinct defense as insufficient in law, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-smith-nyappdiv-1936.