Solomon v. Rothbaum

156 N.Y.S. 1093
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJanuary 20, 1916
StatusPublished

This text of 156 N.Y.S. 1093 (Solomon v. Rothbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Solomon v. Rothbaum, 156 N.Y.S. 1093 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[1, 2] The defendants, by notice of appeal dated December 22, 1915, appealed from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff entered by default, and by a second notice of appeal, dated December 23, 1915, appealed from “a memorandum denying the motion to open the. default.” No appeal lies from a “memorandum,” and no appeal lies from a default judgment. Section 154, Municipal Court Code. There should be an order entered denying the motion to open the default, which should recite all the papers used upon the hearing, or a short form order, referring to the papers used by number. Section 767, C. C. P.; Kirschner v. Abbott’s Bakeries, Inc., 156 N. Y. Supp. 107.

Motion to dismiss appeals granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kirschner ex rel. Kirschner v. Abbotts Bakeries, Inc.
92 Misc. 402 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 N.Y.S. 1093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-rothbaum-nyappterm-1916.