Solomon v. Raleigh Police Department

Fourth Circuit

Solomon v. Raleigh Police Department

667 F. App'x 73

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 29, 2016·No. No. 16-6243·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Solomon appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the ap[74] peal for the reasons stated by the district court. Solomon v. Raleigh Police Dep’t, No. 5:16-cv-00041-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb., 1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Solomon appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the ap[74] peal for the reasons stated by the district court. Solomon v. Raleigh Police Dep’t, No. 5:16-cv-00041-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb., 1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Solomon v. Raleigh Police Department, 667 F. App'x 73 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

667 F. App'x 73 (Solomon v. Raleigh Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related