Solomon v. Quarterman

213 F. App'x 294
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 9, 2007
Docket05-40640
StatusUnpublished

This text of 213 F. App'x 294 (Solomon v. Quarterman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Solomon v. Quarterman, 213 F. App'x 294 (5th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Christopher Julian Solomon appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. *295 § 2254 petition that challenged his conviction and sentence for capital murder. Solomon was sentenced to death, but his death sentence was commuted to life in prison because Solomon was 17 at the time the offense was committed.

Solomon was granted a certificate of appealability (COA) on the issue whether the testimony of witness Virginia Wood was material. The testimony of Wood is material “if the false testimony could ... in any reasonable likelihood have affected the judgment of the jury.” Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, 154, 92 S.Ct. 763, 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1971) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). This determination is a mixed question of law and fact and is reviewed de novo. Valdez v. Cockrell, 274 F.3d 941, 946 (5th Cir.2001); see Nobles v. Johnson, 127 F.3d 409, 416 (1997).

A review of the record reveals that Wood’s testimony regarding Solomon’s guilt was substantially corroborated by the testimony of other witnesses and that Solomon presented significant impeachment evidence against Wood. Solomon has not shown that there is a reasonable likelihood that Wood’s testimony regarding her plea agreement affected the judgment of the jury. See Giglio, 405 U.S. at 153-55, 92 S.Ct. 763; Wilson v. Whitley, 28 F.3d 433, 439 (5th Cir.1994).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *295 published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
213 F. App'x 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-quarterman-ca5-2007.