Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Solomon v. Pepsi-Cola Co.

Solomon v. Pepsi-Cola Co.

140 A.D.2d 323, 527 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4639
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 2, 1988
StatusPublished

This text of 140 A.D.2d 323 (Solomon v. Pepsi-Cola Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Solomon v. Pepsi-Cola Co., 140 A.D.2d 323, 527 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4639 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

The defendant’s motion for summary judgment was properly granted where the plaintiff failed to establish the irreparable harm necessary to support injunctive relief. If the plaintiff has already suffered injury, an action for monetary damages is available; and the plaintiff may avoid any alleged future injury from the defendant’s product by refraining from any further use of that product (see, Multi Media Entertainment v National Telefilm Assocs., 58 AD2d 785). Mangano, J. P., Kunzeman, Rubin and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Multi Media Entertainment, Inc. v. National Telefilm Associates., Inc.
58 A.D.2d 785 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 A.D.2d 323, 527 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-pepsi-cola-co-nyappdiv-1988.