Solomon v. New Jersey Indemnity Co.

113 A. 927, 95 N.J.L. 545, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 149
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Solomon v. New Jersey Indemnity Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 94 N.J.L. 318
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 28, 1921·Published

Opinion

Per Cubiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The ChaNobllor, Chief Justioe, TRENCHard, BergeN, MiNturN,' Nalisch, BlaoK, Kat-zeNbaCI-i, White, HbppeNI-ieiMer, Williams, Taylor, GARDNER, AOKERSON, JJ. 14. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Solomon v. New Jersey Indemnity Co., 113 A. 927, 95 N.J.L. 545, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 149 (N.J. 1921).

113 A. 927 (Solomon v. New Jersey Indemnity Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.