Solomon v. Jacques, No. 09 35 54 (Jul. 2, 1991)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 6257
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedJuly 2, 1991
DocketNo. 09 35 54
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 6257 (Solomon v. Jacques, No. 09 35 54 (Jul. 2, 1991)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Solomon v. Jacques, No. 09 35 54 (Jul. 2, 1991), 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 6257 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is granted as to the defendant Bernard E. Jacques for the reason that the defenses offered by the pleadings either would be precluded by the parol evidence rule or are not legally valid.

Evidence that the contract between the parties included oral arrangements for partial payments would be precluded. Jarvis v. Cunliffe, 140 Conn. 297 (1953).

The "special defenses" simply are not legally sufficient, nor is the mortgage found to be unconscionable.

LEUBA, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jarvis v. Cunliffe
99 A.2d 126 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 6257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-jacques-no-09-35-54-jul-2-1991-connsuperct-1991.