Solomon v. Jacques, No. 09 35 54 (Jul. 2, 1991)

Connecticut Superior Court

Solomon v. Jacques, No. 09 35 54 (Jul. 2, 1991)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 6257

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided July 2, 1991·No. No. 09 35 54·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is granted as to the defendant Bernard E. Jacques for the reason that the defenses offered by the pleadings either would be precluded by the parol evidence rule or are not legally valid.

Evidence that the contract between the parties included oral arrangements for partial payments would be precluded. Jarvis v. Cunliffe, 140 Conn. 297 (1953).

The "special defenses" simply are not legally sufficient, nor is the mortgage found to be unconscionable.

LEUBA, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is granted as to the defendant Bernard E. Jacques for the reason that the defenses offered by the pleadings either would be precluded by the parol evidence rule or are not legally valid.

Evidence that the contract between the parties included oral arrangements for partial payments would be precluded. Jarvis v. Cunliffe, 140 Conn. 297 (1953).

The "special defenses" simply are not legally sufficient, nor is the mortgage found to be unconscionable.

LEUBA, J.

Solomon v. Jacques, No. 09 35 54 (Jul. 2, 1991), 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 6257 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 6257 (Solomon v. Jacques, No. 09 35 54 (Jul. 2, 1991)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related