Solomon v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2007·No. 06-2163·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-2163

SUSAN SOLOMON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-00414-CMH)

Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: February 27, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Susan Solomon, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Jason Mikolashek, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Susan Solomon appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Solomon’s

hostile work environment, disparate treatment, and retaliatory

discharge claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Solomon v. Gonzales, No. 1:06-cv-00414-CMH (E.D. Va.,

Sept. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Solomon v. Gonzales, (4th Cir. 2007).

Solomon v. Gonzales (Solomon v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Definitions
42 U.S.C. § 2000e